Results from the

Galileo

Energetic Particle Detector During the

Amalthea Encounter

of November 5th, 2002

 

Dr. Thomas Armstrong

Lucas Miller

Scott Wadley

Dr. Richard McEntire

Dr. Donald Williams

 

9 December, 2003

American Geophysical Union

San Francisco, California, USA

Presentation Number SM22B-0255


Table of Contents

1 Preliminary............................................................................................................................................................ 1

1.1        Objectives:.................................................................................................................................................. 1

1.2        Background Information............................................................................................................... 2

2 The New Data.......................................................................................................................................................... 4

2.1        Orientation............................................................................................................................................... 4

2.2        Science.......................................................................................................................................................... 6

3 The Outlook......................................................................................................................................................... 18

3.1        Conclusions:........................................................................................................................................... 18

4 References............................................................................................................................................................ 20

A Appendix: Contact information for the Authors................................................................. A-1

 

List of Figures

Figure 1.1 EPD Low Energy Magnetospheric measurements System (LEMMS) Detector Head       3

Figure 2.1 (Galileo’s Trajectory Over the Amalthea Orbit)......................................................... 4

Figure 2.2 (Galileo’s Trajectory Over Amalthean Centered Coordinates)........................ 5

Figure 2.3 Galileo EPD Orbit A34 Distribution of 32 Sector Rates............................................... 6

Figure 2.4 (16 Sector EPD Energy Ion Data Collected Over Amalthea Swingby) Part II 7

Figure 2.5 ( High Energy Electrons as Measured by the EPD Instrument Over the Amalthea Swingby)               8

Figure 2.6 (Galileo EPD Orbit A34 Deadtime Corrected Ion Flux Spectra).............................. 9

Figure 2.7 (Uncorrected Ion Fluxes for Particles with Pitch Angles Between 80 and 100 Degrees Over the Amalthea Swingby..................................................................................................................................... 11

Figure 2.8 (Uncorrected Ion Fluxes for Particles with Pitch Angles Between 80 and 100 Degrees Between 3.8 and 5.3 Rj)............................................................................................................................................................ 12

Figure 2.9 Galileo EPD Ion Pitch Angle Distributions in the Inner Jovian Magnetosphere Part I             13

Figure 2.10 Galileo EPD Ion Pitch Angle Distributions in the Inner Jovian Magnetosphere Part II          14

Figure 2.11 Galileo EPD Ion Pitch Angle Distributions in the Inner Jovian Magnetosphere Part III         15

Figure 2.12 (Galileo EPD Orbit A34 Time Series of 64 Sector Rates: Examination of Possible Amalthean Moonlets).......................................................................................................................................................... 16

 

List of Tables

Table 1.I Important Facts about Jupiter, Amalthea, Galileo, the EPD, and Charged Particles             2

Table 1.II Amalthea Encounter Velocity Summary.......................................................................... 3


1 Preliminary

The purpose of this document is to reformat the poster presentation given at the American Geophysical Union on December 9th 2003, in San Francisco CA by Dr. Thomas Armstrong and Lucas Miller with contributions by the other authors

1.1        Objectives:

There are four main objectives sought in this research:

 

 

1.      Evaluate the performance of the Galileo Orbiter Energetic Particle Detector in the intense radiation environment of the inner (< 6 Rj) Jovian magnetosphere

2.      Search for signatures of interaction between trapped radiation and natural satellites—especially Amalthea.

3.      Calculate and check parameters essential to the interpretation of trapped radiation observations—especially pitch and phase angles.

4.     Begin the analysis of the sources, losses, and transport of trapped radiation.


 

1.2        Background Information

Table 1.I provides some of the necessary facts about the environment of study.

 

Table 1.I Important Facts about Jupiter, Amalthea, Galileo, the EPD, and Charged Particles

Description

Symbol

Value

Units

Jupiter

Mass

MJ

1.9*1027

kg

Equatorial Radius

RJEQ

71398

km

Roche Limit

RJRoche

134211

km

Magnetospheric Angular Velocity

wJ

1.76*10-4

Rad/s

Amalthea

Mass

MA

7.17*1018

kg

Idealized Radius

RA

86.2

km

Density

rA

1800

kg/m3

Orbital Radius

 

181300

km

Orbital Period

PA

11.96

hours

Orbital Eccentricity

 

0.003

~

Galileo

Mass

MGal

2223

kg

Velocity at Amalthea

V

17.05

km/s

Beginning of Mission

 

10/18/89

 

End of Mission- RIP

 

09/21/03

 

EPD

Ion Energy Range

DEZ³1

0.022-100

MeV

Electron Energy Range

DEe-

.015-11

MeV

Charged Particles (At Amalthea)

Gyro-Radius for 1 MeV Proton

R+1 MEV

5.180

km

Gyro-Radius for 2 MeV Proton

R+2 MEV

7.327

km

Gyro-Radius for 1 MeV Electron

R-1 MEV

0.170

km

Gyro-Radius for 10 MeV Electron

R-10 MEV

1.255

km

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1.II Provides calculated values for the velocities of various components in the Jovian centered system.

Table 1.II Amalthea Encounter Velocity Summary

Description

Velocity

 

Magnitude

 

km/s

Amalthea's Orbit

26.47

 

 

Jovian Magnetic Field Rotation at Amalthea

31.88

 

 

Galileo

34.11

 

 

1 MeV Protons ÑB

3.49

2 MeV Protons ÑB

4.94

 

 

1 MeV Proton Gyration

1.3830E+04

2 MeV Proton Gyration

1.9543E+04

1 MeV Electron Gyration

2.8213E+05

10 MeV Electron Gyration

2.9944E+05

 

 

 

 

Figure 1.1 EPD Low Energy Magnetospheric measurements System (LEMMS) Detector Head

 


2 The New Data

2.1        Orientation

 

Figure 2.1 (Galileo’s Trajectory Over the Amalthea Orbit)


 

 

Figure 2.2 (Galileo’s Trajectory Over Amalthean Centered Coordinates)

 

 


2.2        Science

 

Figure 2.3 Galileo EPD Orbit A34 Distribution of 32 Sector Rates

 

 

 

 

Figure 2.4 (16 Sector EPD Energy Ion Data Collected Over Amalthea Swingby) Part II


Figure 2.5 ( High Energy Electrons as Measured by the EPD Instrument Over the Amalthea Swingby


.

Figure 2.6 (Galileo EPD Orbit A34 Deadtime Corrected Ion Flux Spectra)


Dead Time Correction Formulae

 

 

Label

Value

Units

tAS

1.2

ms

tBS

1.2

ms

tCS

1.6

ms

tDS

1.6

ms

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Figure 2.7 (Uncorrected Ion Fluxes for Particles with Pitch Angles Between 80 and 100 Degrees Over the Amalthea Swingby

 

Figure 2.8 (Uncorrected Ion Fluxes for Particles with Pitch Angles Between 80 and 100 Degrees Between 3.8 and 5.3 Rj)


Figure 2.9 Galileo EPD Ion Pitch Angle Distributions in the Inner Jovian Magnetosphere Part I


Figure 2.10 Galileo EPD Ion Pitch Angle Distributions in the Inner Jovian Magnetosphere Part II


 

Figure 2.11 Galileo EPD Ion Pitch Angle Distributions in the Inner Jovian Magnetosphere Part III

 


 

Figure 2.12 (Galileo EPD Orbit A34 Time Series of 64 Sector Rates: Examination of Possible Amalthean Moonlets)

 


 

The Star Scanner

The star scanner (Fiesler at JPL) registered brief responses after Amalthea closest approach.  These responses could be due to moonlets traveling with Amalthea in its orbit.  Searching through the EPD high-resolution data, several micro-signature candidates for these moonlets where observed.  There is a slight lag, however, between the time stamps of the EPD and star scanner events.

 

 


3 The Outlook

 

3.1        Conclusions:

 

1.      Penetrating electrons (>1 MeV) are diminished by about a factor of 10 in intensity beginning at 6:18:27 and ending at 6:18:44 SCET.  Closest approach of the Galileo orbiter to Amalthea occurred at 6:18:40 SCET.  We believe that this feature is caused by the absorption of penetrating electrons by Amalthea.

 

2.      Deadtime corrected EPD measured the energy spectra of 0.5 to 10 MeV protons to be:

a          1.42 x 105 E-1.1 at the center of the absorption feature and b      5.21 x 105 E-2.2 outside the feature

 

3.      Uncorrected EPD measurements of the ion fluxes between 3.8 and 5.3 Rj were found to be :

a          Flux = (8*107)*e-1.175*Rj for 0.515-0.825 MeV ions.

b          Flux = (2*107)*e-1.208*Rj for 0.828-1.680 MeV ions.

c          Flux = (2*107)*e-1.498*Rj for 1.680-3.20 MeV ions.

 

4.      The absorption of ions by Amalthea is energy dependent.

 

5.      The absorption of ions by Amalthea is strongest at 90 degrees local pitch angle.

 

6.      The theoretical dipole loss cone at 2.5 Rj is approximately 11 degrees.  Observations of 0.5 to 10 MeV ions at 2.521 Rj cover the range from 6.5 to 125 degrees of pitch angle and show the lowest (possibly zero) flux in the loss cone.  The instrument acceptance angle of +/- 7.5 degrees did not resolve the loss cone.

 

7.      Pitch angle distributions (PAD’s) of energetic ions appear to be of two types: One type is broadly peaked at 90 degrees and the second has two peaks (approximately 60 and 120 degrees).  Some PADs appear to have evidence of complicated gradient anisotropies.  We have found no evidence of convection related anisotropy (nor did we expect to for 0.5 to 10 MeV protons at the modest convection speeds (30 km/sec) of the inner magnetosphere.

 


4 References

 

1.        Cravens, Thomas E, Physics of Solar System Plasmas, Cambridge University Press, 1997

2.        http://www.solarviews.com/eng/amalthea.htm

3.        http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/past/galileo.html

 


A Appendix: Contact Information for the Authors

 

1.      Dr. Thomas Armstrong

            Fundamental Technologies, LLC

armstrong@ftecs.com

 

2.      Lucas Miller

Fundamental Technologies, LLC

lmiller@math.ukans.edu

 

3.      Scott Wadley

Fundamental Technologies, LLC

swadley@ftecs.com

 

4.      Dr. Richard McEntire

Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

richard.mcentire@jhuapl.edu

 

5.      Dr. Donald Williams

Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory

donald.williams@jhuapl.edu

 

 

 

Fundamental Technologies, LLC

2411 Ponderosa Dr. Suite A

Lawrence KS 66046

(785) 840-0800 (phone)

(785) 840-0808 (fax)

www.ftecs.com